Democracy? This text should cure you of any illusions.
Freedom? Try leaving dissenting comments at sites like Helpcatalonia or the homepage of a party called Reagrupament, to mention just two good examples where you get blocked straight out. Several times I've also criticised on this blog the newspaper La Vanguardia for its online comment policy. Fortunately, this seems to have improved lately. Meanwhile, other, even more nationalist online outlets we also subsidise with our tax money, seem to be going the other way. Not to speak of the reactions of some of the public when you (are allowed to) make use of your right of freedom of speech. In the more radicalised circles they range from insults to threats. But that, truth be told, is a very Spanish problem: in 30 odd years of democracy no valid debate culture has been created and everything is highly partisan and gregarious. Which doesn't make it better, but worse in its effect.
Or are freedom and democracy represented by the phenomena referred to in this article? No. This is not the freedom from undue interference by the authorities as guaranteed by the rule of law. It is representative of the daily erosion of the rule of law. And the democracy that Mr Homs claims there is not a general, but an ethnic one. So it's none.
Magnified a hundred times by an uncritical or even sympathetic press, the perversion of democracy and freedom has taken hold on the people, and even intelligent and otherwise good people have bought into it. The Banality of Evil.
Nationalism is rampant, and perceived grievances are the perfect excuse for mostly anything. As usual, such a situation is being taken advantage of by political leaders of all shades. We have not seen the end of it, a radicalised few are waiting for the right leader, one must fear that violence will follow.
Update July 31: A pivotal example of the perversion that is Catalan nationalism has come from the pen of Marta Alòs, member of the Catalan parliament for governing CiU and one of the dumbest -hence also most sincere- columnists this region has to offer. Today she calls Pau Gasol a traitor for carrying the Spanish flag at this year's Summer Olympics.
This is the individual freedom these extremists want when they speak, as they do every day, of "national freedom". Next: a referendum on the independence of Catalonia rendering the two options on the ballot paper as "Catalans" and "Traitors".
Moronic Marta honestly believes in what she says, and thus truly represents a growing sector that proves there should not be any such referendum as long as Catalan nationalism resembles more a conversion disorder than a mature political option that accepts a free and informed choice of its citizens instead of browbeating them into submission.
Even though we do have democracy, a ruling ideology that is not contested and that is uncritical with its more extreme expressions can have the same psychological, and in consequence political, effects as any officially totalitarian system. I am reminded every day more of the German parliament approving the war bonds that made the Great War possible notably with the votes of the SPD. Next were hundreds of thousands of young men marching proudly to their doom under the hurrays of their families.
CiU does nothing to call back its attack dogs. Quite on the contrary, Catalan president Artur Mas has designated the higher ranks of his administration as "generals of an army with an historic mission".
Oh, just when I could finally say something positive about Catalonia's worst newspaper, there its minions go again. For about an hour and a half I have tried to lodge a comment to an article by das Rahola:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.lavanguardia.com/opinion/articulos/20120729/54331741793/el-riesgo-de-leer-por-pilar-rahola.html
Here's the comment I just sent for a third time:
"El riesgo de escribir: Cara al público eres lo que escribes y lo que puedes citar correctamente. Y la cita correcta de Borges es: "Uno no es *lo que es* por lo que escribe, sino por lo que ha leído." Obviously nothing offensive there.
Das Rahola is one of the many half-lives around, leeching on nationalism and the dubious fame gained in thirdworldian TV debates (actually, I'd prefer Third World over Spain here). And she has the tic of misquoting, like yesterday, when she turned to the Spanish Constitution. And Erich Fromm.
Yesterday's comment went through. Apparently I'm to blame that she did it again today, so the public has to be kept ignorant.
Sent for 4th time, and counting (how many times they say "Gracias por tu participación").
DeleteOff for a break.
In the end, I tried some 10x without succeeding. Anybody can compare this to other newspapers, be it in Spain or worldwide. Then you know what I mean when I talk of the suppression of dissent as a necessary part of the more broader effort of manufacturing consent. Classical.
DeleteIf you don't want to read about this phenomenon, there's film: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent:_Noam_Chomsky_and_the_Media
In Catalonia, nationalism is the asset of corporate interests. Nothing new here.
Not new either is that it's also the main asset of the extremist few who are nationalist purists. Nació Digital has now taken to supervising more strictly its comments sections. It's traditionally allowed all kinds of insults. Now it must be feared that the supervision will censor out dissent, not the potty mouths. We'll know that pretty soon.
One can learn a helluva lot of good things from the US. Catalonia is bent on learning only the negative stuff. Dog shave its president.
I'm convinced that misquotations are among the worst scourges brought upon us by the Internet. But when a "serious" commentator who writes in a "serious" newspaper dares to quote Borges without taking a minute to check if she's got the quote right, it makes my eyes bleed. Das Rahola sinks to new lows every day.
ReplyDeleteYup, that's the "free" Catalonia people like Marteta want. A country where dissenters or simply people who have a Spanish national sentiment are branded as "traitors". And she's supposed to be a member of a "moderate" and "sensible" Catalanist party.
ReplyDeleteEi Candide,
ReplyDeletea la capçalera del teu blog, on fiques "Research, reporting, analysis, opinion.". Li falta "hate". Probablement amb les 4 lletres majuscules.
Atentament,
Jordi
Home, Anònim, no exageris. De comentaris com el teu n'hi ha al blog, però són massa pocs com per posar això a la capçalera.
DeleteYou beat me to it!
DeleteOh, sorry, he wasn't anonymous. His name's Jordi.
ReplyDeleteComo en otra entrada he utilizado el catalán y mi inglés llega para la lectura (dificultosa) asistida por San Google Translator, aquí voy a utilizar el castellano. Gracias a los dioses soy bilingüe sin ningún complejo.
ReplyDeleteEn otra entrada, hablando de la dudosa "calidad" de la democracia española, intentaba hacerle observar el perverso sistema electoral que imposibilita la discrepancia antes de la confección de las listas. Una frase muy famosa de Alfonso Guerra, paradigma de apparatchik, que describe perfectamente el funcionamiento de cooptación de las cupulas dirigentes de los partidos: "El que se mueva, no sale en la foto."
Simplemente echando un vistazo a la biografía-currículum de esta señora en http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marta_Al%C3%B2s_i_L%C3%B3pez describe perfectamente las capacidades de la Doña.
Desgraciadamente no dice nada extraño ni original. Sandeces equivalentes se pueden encontrar en el otro bando referidos por ejemplo a Àlex Fàbregas, jugador de hockey.
Creo que no puede sorprender a nadie medianamente inteligente el uso interesado del agravio, de la acusación patriótica, de la descalificación personal e incluso la amenaza física, en estos momentos de crisis económica.
Por mucho que usted se empeñe, no existe en el mundo ningún colectivo que se pueda definir con el palabro inventado por los nacionalistas españoles como nonacionalista. El nacionalismo está tan extendido como tener pelos en las ingles o tener un ombligo en el centro del abdomen.
El problema surge cuando hay una situación de crisis, de convulsión social, de desesperación de las capas humildes y medianas de la sociedad. Entonces los políticos excitan a las masas acusando a otro de todos los males que les aquejan.
Y si los agravios tienen base real (independientemente de quien sea el responsable último) más éxito tienen las soflamas.
Para documentar esto último, recomiendo un libro publicado en 1999 por La Campana Edicions, titulado "6 milions d'innocents (menys uns quants espavilats)" escrito por un colectivo llamado J.B.Boix.
Han pasado 13 años, dos tripartitos y un nuevo estatuto pero tiene la misma validez que cuando fue escrito.
Estará de acuerdo que las sandeces de una parlamentaria tienen más peso que las de personas privadas.
DeleteGracias por sugerir el libro.
Evidentemente, la idiotez expresada en público es mas grave cuando el idiota "expresivo" es un cargo electo.
DeleteRepito y siento ser pesado, el sistema de partidos español está viciado de inicio, debido al sistema electoral.
Si los electos lo fueran nominalmente, siendo responsables directos ante sus electores, personajes como esta doña no llegarían ni a telefonistas del partido.
Este sistema ha hecho que personajes políticos importantes durante la transición hayan desaparecido de escena asqueados de sus propios partidos. Ahora me vienen a la memoria por ejemplo Miguel Herrero y R.de Miñón (redactor de la Constitución), Manuel Milian Mestre, Óscar Alzaga...